@redp314 reviews pull requests with one TypeSafe call that returns 14 probability checks, including hardcoded secrets, SQL injection, auth, deleted tests, API breaks, migrations, debug leftovers, whether the description matches the diff, blast radius, and reviewer effort. Code turns that into BLOCK, security review, nits, or merge, and uncertain critical checks (0.35–0.65) escalate. They cite 6 real PRs at $0.00007 each.

Paolo Rosson (@redp314) published this on 2026-09-17. @redp314 reviews pull requests with one TypeSafe call that returns 14 probability checks, including hardcoded secrets, SQL injection, auth, deleted tests, API breaks, migrations, debug leftovers, whether the description matches the diff, blast radius, and reviewer effort. Code turns that into BLOCK, security review, nits, or merge, and uncertain critical checks (0.35–0.65) escalate. They cite 6 real PRs at $0.00007 each. got Jev to review my PRs. ~200x cheaper than Claude and it answers in half a second 6 real PRs in the video. How Jev or TypeSafe is used, in the post's own words: “got Jev to review my PRs.” The post does not name a separate audience. It is for people reading what @redp314 shows here (it includes media).