@coolish compared playing Slay the Spire 2: GPT-6 Astra was capable but slow, while Jev acted in 0.7 seconds, fast enough that they say they could not follow the screen.

paulwei (@coolish) published this on 2026-09-17. @coolish compared playing Slay the Spire 2: GPT-6 Astra was capable but slow, while Jev acted in 0.7 seconds, fast enough that they say they could not follow the screen. 昨天出的 https://t.co/6eiMFaJTrj Jev 模型 适合高频决策，那岂不又是适合打游戏？ 之前用 GPT-6 Astra 代打杀戮尖塔2 能力强但速度慢。 我刚实测用 Jev 打，行动思考只需 0.7秒， 画面我都没看清它就操作完了。 这超人类游戏速度， 着实又让我震惊瘫坐了😅 语言很难描述这感觉，看视频⬇️ https://t.co/y9Nu78Hnv4 How Jev or TypeSafe is used, in the post's own words: “昨天出的 https://t.co/6eiMFaJTrj Jev 模型 适合高频决策，那岂不又是适合打游戏？” The post does not name a separate audience. It is for people reading what @coolish shows here (it links to typesafe.ai; it quotes @CompleteSkeptic; it includes media).